Is somebody else supposed to take care of climate change?

02-08-06 ...coal elevator to the fires of Hell

Here’s an excellent NY Times feature on how governmental budgets aren’t up to thechallenge of global warming. While current research topics include algae strains that can turn sunlight into hydrogen fuel, the inkjet-style printing of photovoltaic cells and kite-like windmills to harvest the immense energy in the jet stream, government spending on blue sky research and on the expensive tasks involved in getting something off the drawing board. If we don’t create these technologies now, our infant engineers and scientists won’t have much to build on. For those who say: let the market handle it, the NYT offers:

While private investors and entrepreneurs are jumping into alternative energy projects, they cannot be counted on to solve such problems, economists say, because even the most aggressive venture capitalists want a big payback within five years.

The Apollo AllianceIt strikes me (again) that we would be a lot better served if we could cease all subsidies of petroleum immediately and channel it into something like The Apollo Alliance – spending government money to encourage the creation of good jobs in renewable energy.

Mother Jones offers a bit of a silver lining, saying that Senators Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Jay Rockefeller, (D-W.Va) have written to ExxonMobil demanding that the company “stop funding groups that have spread the idea that global warming is a myth and that try to influence policymakers to adopt that view.”

The recently released Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change estimates that if we don’t act, the overall costs and risks of climate change will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global GDP each year, now and forever. If a wider range of risks and impacts is taken into account, the estimates of damage could rise to 20% of GDP or more. In contrast, the costs of action – reducing greenhouse gas emissions to avoid the worst impacts of climate change – can be limited to around 1% of global GDP each year. What’s more, the investment that takes place in the next 10-20 years will have a profound effect on the climate in the second half of this century and in the next.

About the photo(grapher): 02-08-06 … coal elevator to the fires of Hell is a shot of the Cheshire, OH Coal Power Plant. Jeremy Stump sounds like he has a cool life: designing and building skate parks, traveling a lot. Check out his site for some awesome photos.


3 thoughts on “Is somebody else supposed to take care of climate change?

  1. There exist of old alternatives to oil. One that has come up to the light is desserts and mirrors. I do not remember now the site where this news appeared. I’ll try to get it and pass it over.

    The sun, the sea, the winds, elements that we have continously around us will be the solution to suppress all that contamination and the subsequent warming of our planet, that, much that some interested parties speak to the contrary, is really warming and not many years will elapse before we will be feeling ourselves the impact.


  2. farlane says:

    I agree, Jose. Thanks for stopping by!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s